Powered by MA-06
Dan represents Washington in Andover. Tram represents Andover in Washington.
Tram donors in MA-06
28%
Koh donors in MA-06
8%
Every number on this page is derived from public FEC Schedule A filings for the 2026 cycle. Last refreshed 4/24/2026.
Tram donors who live inside MA-06
27.6%
69 of 250 itemized donors
Koh donors who live inside MA-06
7.9%
132 of 1,673 itemized donors
Koh donors from Washington-area ZIPs
13.3%
223 donors · $201K raised
The numbers behind the line
Same four stats, same two places, both candidates. Where each donor base actually lives.
Dan Koh
in the Washington, D.C. metro
Raised
$201K
Donors
223
Share of his base
13.3%
Dan Koh
in MA-06 (the district he would represent)
Raised
$253K
Donors
132
Share of his base
7.9%
Tram Nguyen
in the Washington, D.C. metro
Raised
$4K
Donors
7
Share of her base
2.8%
Tram Nguyen
in MA-06 (the district she would represent)
Raised
$69K
Donors
69
Share of her base
27.6%
Koh has 1.7× more donors in Washington than in the district he would represent. Tram has 10× more donors in the district than in Washington.
Bar view
Same four segments, three ways to scan them
One row per (candidate × place). Bar length is proportional to the largest value in that chart, so you can compare within a metric at a glance.
Dollars raised
Number of donors
Share of donor base
Dollar flow by region
Where every itemized dollar actually comes from
A different view of the map: each candidate’s full itemized haul segmented by the region their donors live in. Each bar is 100% of that candidate’s total itemized raise.
Tram Nguyen
$338,727 total itemized
Dan Koh
$3,256,497 total itemized
20.4% of Tram’s itemized dollars come from inside MA-06. 7.8% of Koh’s do. Koh raises more from Greater Boston, more from New York, and more from Washington, D.C. than from the district he would represent.
The map
Where each campaign’s donors actually live
Loading donor geography...
Off this map
223 of Koh’s donors live in the Washington, D.C. metro.
That’s $201K raised from outside the district. Tram’s Washington-area total: 7 donors.
Each dot is one itemized ($200+) donor at their FEC-reported ZIP centroid, jittered ~250m for privacy. Black outline is the MA-06 congressional district. Small-dollar (under $200) donors cannot appear on the map — they are disclosed to the FEC only in aggregate.
Clustered view
The same map, grouped by neighborhood
Loading donor geography…
Overlapping donors merge into sized circles labeled with how many donors sit in each neighborhood. MA-06 reads as a tight blue cluster; Koh’s red clusters are pulled toward Boston. Zoom in to break clusters back into individual dots.
Town-by-town
The towns where the campaign is built
Itemized FEC filings show where Tram’s larger contributions come from. The real grassroots base is bigger — most small-dollar donors live under the $200 itemization threshold and don’t appear by name in any filing.
In-district itemized dollars
$69K
from 69 MA-06 neighbors
Small-dollar community
$79K
19.0%of Tram’s fundraising — from under-$200 donors the FEC reports only in aggregate
Median itemized gift
$500
Neighbor-sized checks — half of Tram’s itemized donors gave at or below this level
Top MA-06 towns by dollars raised
Boxford
$35K
from 21 itemized donors
Andover
$15K
from 18 itemized donors
Haverhill
$5K
from 3 itemized donors
North Andover
$4K
from 9 itemized donors
Methuen
$4K
from 3 itemized donors
Newburyport
$2K
from 3 itemized donors
Small-dollar support
More neighbors, smaller checks
On FEC filings, contributions under $200 are reported only in aggregate. The share of a campaign’s total raised from those small-dollar donors is a clean read on grassroots depth — and the contrast here is stark.
Tram small-dollar share
19.0%
$79K from donors under $200
Koh small-dollar share
3.2%
$108K from donors under $200
What this means
This race is about who carries MA-06’s voice to Washington
A donor file is one of the few campaign-era documents a voter can actually read before election day. It shows who is investing in the race, and from where.
On public FEC records for this cycle, Tram Nguyen’s itemized donor base is concentrated where she’ll represent. Dan Koh’s donor base is dominated by donors outside the district, with a substantial Washington-area cluster.
The contrast is clear: Tram’s support is local, broad, and grassroots.
Back the neighbors, not the networks.
If you live in MA-06, your contribution is on this map.
Methodology & sources
How we built this
- · Itemized metrics include only FEC Schedule A individual contributions (>$200 aggregate).
- · Unitemized dollars come from the F3 summary; individual small-dollar donors cannot be geocoded.
- · District status uses Census TIGERweb 119th Congress polygon with ZIP allowlist fallback.
- · DC metro = DC + inner-ring MD/VA ZIPs per config.DC_METRO_PATTERNS.
Generated 4/24/2026, 8:01:03 PM. Sources: FEC Schedule A (itemized), F3 summary (unitemized aggregates), Census TIGERweb (district boundary), Census Geocoder (ZIP centroids).